On Systematizing Theory-Building Case Studies
Keywords:systematizing case studies, “logical operations”, induction, deduction, abduction, Assimilation model
AbstractBill Stiles wants to enhance the reliability and the utility of theory-building case studies. To do so, he proposes a systematic, replicable approach to clinical case materials that to date has been difficult to use systematically. At the core of his proposal is what he calls “logical operations,” which include some familiar elements of logic: deduction, induction, and abduction. While not without problems in concept and execution, Stiles’ proposal offers those who want to use theory-building case studies in their own work the prospect of an empirically-based analytic tool in a field that has not to this time had one.
How to Cite
Nathan, P. E. (2009). On Systematizing Theory-Building Case Studies. Pragmatic Case Studies in Psychotherapy, 5(3), 80–89. https://doi.org/10.14713/pcsp.v5i3.978
Copyright for articles published in this journal is retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles are free to use, with proper attribution, in educational and other non-commercial settings. The author has agreed to the journal's author's agreement.
All articles in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.