Skip to main content
Skip to main navigation menu
Skip to site footer
Open Menu
Current
Archives
Announcements
About
About the Journal
Submissions
Editors and Founding Editorial Board
Privacy Statement
Contact
Search
Register
Login
Home
/
Archives
/
Vol. 17 No. 1 (2021): Comparative Case Analysis Using Contrasting Interpersonal Theories
Vol. 17 No. 1 (2021): Comparative Case Analysis Using Contrasting Interpersonal Theories
Published:
04/19/2021
Introduction and Background
Editor's Introduction: The Psychotherapy Case of "Sharon" -- A Comparative Analysis Using Contrasting Interpersonal Theories
Daniel B Fishman
1-4
PDF
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14713/pcsp.v17i1.2083
Goals and Design of the Project and Basic Information About Sharon’s Case
Michael A. Westerman, Kenneth L. Critchfield
5-18
PDF
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14713/pcsp.v17i1.2084
Contrasting Theoretical Analyses of the Case of “Sharon”
The Case of Sharon Considered from the Vantage Point of Interpersonal Defense Theory
Michael A. Westerman
19-41
PDF
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14713/pcsp.v17i1.2086
The Case of Sharon Considered from the Vantage Point of Interpersonal Reconstructive Therapy
Kenneth L. Critchfield, Julia Dobner-Pereira, Eliza Stucker
42-62
PDF
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14713/pcsp.v17i1.2087
Comparisons of the Two Theoretical Analyses from Each Perspective
Comparing Interpersonal Defense Theory and Interpersonal Reconstructive Therapy and Their Views of Sharon’s Case
Michael A. Westerman
63-84
PDF
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14713/pcsp.v17i1.2088
Interpersonal Wishes and Fears with Regard to Internalized Attachment Figures: Differing Focus of Two Case Formulation Methods that use SASB
Kenneth L. Critchfield, Julia Dobner-Pereira, Eliza Stucker
85-103
PDF
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14713/pcsp.v17i1.2089
Commentary and Response
How Do We Decide Which of Two Case Formulations Is Correct? Commentary on Westerman and Critchfield et al.
Stanley B. Messer
104-108
PDF
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14713/pcsp.v17i1.2090
Philosophical Considerations and Research Ideas About Comparing the Two Approaches: Messer’s Comments Point the Way Forward
Michael A. Westerman, Kenneth L. Critchfield
109-122
PDF
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14713/pcsp.v17i1.2091