The Case of Ms. Q: A Demonstration of Integrative Psychotherapy Guided by "Core Clinical Hypotheses"
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14713/pcsp.v5i1.958Keywords:
psychotherapy integration, case study, case formulation, marital conflict, divorce, self-actualization, integrative psychotherapyAbstract
This case study describes the treatment of a married mother—Ms. Q—in her mid-thirties who sought help for making major life decisions that involved her marriage, career, obligations as a parent, and self-development. A model and method for conducting theoretically integrated therapy as described in the author’s book, Clinical Case Formulations (Wiley, 2006), is illustrated through case formulation charts and narrative discussion of the choice points in therapy with Ms. Q. The treatment integrated clinical hypotheses from five theoretically differentiated categories: existential/spiritual (issues of choice, responsibility, commitment, meaning and creativity); psychodynamic (conflicting inner parts, immature “self,” and unresolved guilt and abandonment fears from past relationships); cognitive (faulty schemas about responsibility, parenting, and marriage); behavioral/learning (conditioned emotional responses and lack of skills in decision making, emotional regulation, and marital communication); and social/cultural/environmental (family systems factors, issues of culture and gender, and need for appropriate work environment.)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright for articles published in this journal is retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles are free to use, with proper attribution, in educational and other non-commercial settings. The author has agreed to the journal's author's agreement.
All articles in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.