Generating and Generalizing Knowledge about Psychotherapy from Pragmatic Case Studies
Keywords:case studies, single-subject versus group psychotherapy research, case formulation, Aristotelian versus Galilean thinking, epistemology
AbstractAn epistemological case is made for how single subject psychotherapy research provides unique and untapped opportunities for generating and generalizing scientific knowledge about psychotherapy. The epistemological claim asserts that it is essential that problem and method be aligned in psychotherapy research. Examples of misalignment in experimental and correlational contexts are given and their consequences discussed. Both Molenaar and Valsiner's (2005) genetic metaphor of phenotypes and genotypes and Lewin's (1931) concept of Aristotelian and Galileian thinking provides further epistemological grounds for the value of single subject research. Several suggestions are made for how to reconcile the epistemological problems discussed. Finally, examples are given of how a database generated by the PCSP journal process might serve as a tool to generate and generalize psychotherapy knowledge.
How to Cite
Eells, T. D. (2007). Generating and Generalizing Knowledge about Psychotherapy from Pragmatic Case Studies. Pragmatic Case Studies in Psychotherapy, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.14713/pcsp.v3i1.893
Copyright for articles published in this journal is retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles are free to use, with proper attribution, in educational and other non-commercial settings. The author has agreed to the journal's author's agreement.
All articles in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.