How the Case of Vumile Contributes to the Evidence Base for Cognitive Therapy with Social Phobia as an Empirically Grounded Clinical Intervention
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14713/pcsp.v2i1.871Keywords:
case study methodology, cognitive therapy, evidence-based practice, manualized treatment, social phobiaAbstract
This article is a response to commentaries by Davison (2005), S. Fishman (2006), Sanderson (2006), and Turk (2006) on Edwards and Kannan’s (2006) case study, which documents the response to group therapy of Vumile, a South African student with social phobia. The case material is discussed in relation to five themes raised by the commentators: (a) the tension between structure and flexibility in manualization of treatments, (b) theoretical and practical aspects of the planning and implementation of the intervention, (c) the adaptation of an individual treatment to a group therapy format, (d) methodological aspects of data collection, and (e) methodological aspects related to the drawing of conclusions from the case material. Broader implications are drawn for the place of case-based methodology in the development of evidence-based practice in psychotherapy.Published
02/18/2006
How to Cite
Edwards, D. J. (2006). How the Case of Vumile Contributes to the Evidence Base for Cognitive Therapy with Social Phobia as an Empirically Grounded Clinical Intervention. Pragmatic Case Studies in Psychotherapy, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.14713/pcsp.v2i1.871
Issue
Section
Case Study
License
Copyright for articles published in this journal is retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles are free to use, with proper attribution, in educational and other non-commercial settings. The author has agreed to the journal's author's agreement.
All articles in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.