Understanding the Role of Inflexibly Enacted Masculinity Norms in Therapy: A Commentary on the Case of "Tommy"
Keywords:psychology of men and masculinity, adolescents, masculine identity development, inflexibly-enacted traditional masculine norms (IE-TMNs), interpersonal therapy, precarious manhood theory, case study, hybrid case study
The case of "Tommy" highlights both an underutilized methodology for increasing the field’s understanding of the therapeutic process in working with men, and the importance of addressing inflexibly enacted masculinity norms. My commentary focuses on detailing how the methodology helps those of us interested in understanding how masculine norms contribute to men’s presenting concerns, help-seeking, and experiences in treatment focusing on the multi-directionality of relational experiences, masculine identity development, and presenting issues. Then I discuss how the concepts of inflexibility has its roots within an Interpersonal Therapy framework (e.g., Kiesler, 1983) and how this inflexibility develops consistently with explanations contained in Precarious Manhood Theory (i.e., Vandello & Bosson, 2013).
How to Cite
Copyright for articles published in this journal is retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles are free to use, with proper attribution, in educational and other non-commercial settings. The author has agreed to the journal's author's agreement.
All articles in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.